Blog

CURIOUS MADCAPS - ENGLISH TOY TERRIER KENNEL
Schriftgröße: +

Manchester Terrier Weight: Part 1 (History)

Manchester Terrier Weight: Part 1 (History)

At the US National Specialty last month, weight became a central issue of Standard Manchester Terrier judging when weight was called on an exhibit.  A discussion subsequently followed at the AMTC annual general meeting regarding the possibility of enforced weighing of all exhibits at the national specialty each year. The motion to take the issue to the membership, I am told, was narrowly defeated and I was approached by several people afterward asking about the history of the use of weight as a measurement as well as the history of weights cited in breed standards.  

I was a little troubled, honestly, that any conversation was had about any action that might influence the future of the breed without all members first having a very clear understanding of the history and context surrounding the issue.  With that in mind, I thought a historical primer on weight might be of benefit in the ongoing discourse on the subject within the breed.  

So, here's what I know (bearing in mind that (a) I am concentrating on the Standard variety and, so, sources can't be seen as complete for the TMT or ETT as I have left some discussions relevant to those groups out; and, (b) I am concentrating on the breed's history as a rat baiter exclusively because that is the sole basis for use of weight and the only function listed in the original breed standards upon which the current US breed standard's size range is based):

1) The use of weight as a method of determining size directly stems from an issue of form for original function and finds its source in the way rat pit matches were handicapped.  In competitions between dogs, size differences were accounted for by assigning the number of rats to be killed by each dog according to its weight.  I wrote an article called "Why Weight?" on this subject for the Fall 2010 issue of Black & Tan Magazine and would encourage those interested to read the full piece here http://www.fwaggle.com/weight.html as it explains exactly how weight was used in competition. 

In reading this article, there are two things to keep in mind:

a) Rat pit matches came in several forms, so weight handicaps didn't always apply. Sometimes a match was just one dog with a number of rats against the clock, sometimes it was two dogs of comparable size with a certain number of rats against the clock, and sometimes it was two disproportionate dogs against each other where a weight handicap was needed. As a result, weight wasn't always important.

b) The historical record tells us that the most successful black and tan pit ratter, Tiny, weighed in at 5 1/2 pounds and one of the most famous pit ratters in general (not a black and tan), Billy, weighed in at 27 pounds.  

2) Text records from the time when dogs were being actively used in the rat pits do not define the 'breed' by anything other than colour. Competitors came in all shapes and sizes and references to size form part of the description for all contenders in much the same way boxers are announced today. There were certainly no parameters or limits assigned to size as emphasis was very much on ability. Black and tan coloured dogs in the rat pits could have been 5 pounds, 12 pounds, 6 pounds, 24 pounds....it didn't matter. In fact, we have little information about those dogs at all other than their varied size, colour and occasional references to smooth coat.  

3) The idea of describing dogs from the perspective of breeds doesn't really occur until the 1860s, rather after rat baiting had its hey day. As these descriptions eventually gave way to breed standards however, they provide some excellent insight into how we ended up where we are today. 

As you will see, the size range ascribed to our breed has varied considerably over its history, both in early descriptions and official breed standards.  In most cases, the descriptions of large and small Manchesters remained the same aside from size, just as is the case today:

- In 1861, John Meyrick described the English Terrier (Toy) as 3-4 pounds and not over 6 pounds (I include this  as a reference for increases over time) while in 1862 Stonehenge refers to the Old English Terrier as weighing 7-12 pounds. 
- In 1865 Reverend George Wood describes the English Terrier as not larger than 10 pounds. At this time, the bull-and-terrier crosses are referred to somewhat separately, with Wood indicating that "In size it is extremely variable, some specimens being among the smallest of the canine tribes, while others measure as much as twenty inches in height...
- In 1867, Stonehenge describes the Old English Terrier as weighing "from 6lb. to l0lb., or even 20lb".  
- In 1872, Stonehenge describes a generic black and tan smooth-coated dog as above and later in discussion of the Black-and-Tan Terrier specifically describes size as from "7lb to 25lb, but the best size is about l0lb. or 12lb." 
- In 1878, Dalziel describes the breed as weighing from "10lb. up to 16lb." with the smaller Toy version weighing in at 3lb. to 6lb. In 1879, Dalziel goes even further by providing "size and dimension of a few good specimens" as follows: "Mr. F.W. Parry's Saff: Age, 2 years, 9 months ; weight 19 1/2 lbs. ; height at shoulder 15 inches"; "Mr. W.K. Taunton's Swift (KCSB 8631): Age 2 years ; weight 24 lbs. ; height at shoulder 16 inches"; "Mr. W.K. Taunton's Black Bess (KCSB 8635): Age 2 years ; weight 16 1/2 lbs. ; height at shoulder 13 inches"; "Mr. W.K. Taunton's Stella (KCSB 3024): Age 2 years and 2 months ; weight 18 lbs. ; height at shoulder 14 1/2 inches". 
- In 1887, Stonehenge described the breed as "10 to 12 lb up to 18 lbs, or a trifle more" with the Toy variety not to exceed 6 pounds. 
- In 1894, Rawdon Lee put forward the description of the breed adopted by the Black and Tan Terrier Club of England, which described three sizes: "Weight – Not exceeding 7 lb; not exceeding 16 lb, not exceeding 20 lb." but also noted that the Manchester or English Toy Terrier Club (a rival club, assumably) limited size to 18 pounds. 
- In 1903, the Black and Tan Terrier Club of the UK described sizes as" For Toys, not exceeding 7 lb.; for the large breed, from 16 lb. to 20 lb., is most desirable." 
- in 1905, we know dogs being exhibited were larger because the Manitoba Challenge Cup was awarded to "the best medium weight (17 pound) Black and Tan Terrier in Show"
- By 1938, breed standards in use in North America reflected the current 12 pound limit for Toy Manchesters and 12-22 pounds for Standard Manchesters, with no disqualification for over 22 pounds.

Now, if you made it through all of those long citations I'm impressed!  If not, here's the summary.  From 1861 until present day the upper register for the smaller English/Black and Tan/Manchester Terriers has varied from a low of 3-4 pounds to a high of  our current 12 pounds. The larger variety has taken the opposite course, starting out at a high of 25 pounds in the 1870s, "18 pounds or a trifle more" in the 1880s, 20 pounds in the 1890s, and 22 pounds some time in the early 1900s.  There was even a time when three sizes were described.

4) No disqualification for size existed in the breed's history anywhere in the world until 1958 when it was added to the American breed standard following unification of the breed as one breed with two varieties. I don't know where the idea for the disqualification came from (was it the TMT members wanting to protect their 6-8 pound dogs from getting too large?  Was it the AKC's influence? Was it the small number of SMT breeders?"). We do know, however, that this addition was not universally supported as when the new breed standard was presented to the Canadian Kennel Club's board of directors for adoption (it was the custom to use AKC standards at the time), letters were submitted by a number of individuals, including prominent Standard Manchester Terrier breeders Mac McLean (Willowdale Kennels) and Ruth Turner (Chatham), with the end result being the CKC Board voting not to adopt the revised breed standard as a result of resistance to the new disqualification.  Today, the United States remains the only country in the world with a disqualification for size.

5) I do not have a date when the switch from weight to height was made to European breed standards and am unable to comment on how the height range was determined.  To be clear though, they did not change from a weight range with a DQ'd limit to an ideal height, rather they moved from the model seen in the current Canadian Manchester Terrier breed standard which simply states the weight range is "12-22 lb. (5-10 kg)" to their current description of "Ideal height at shoulders: dogs: 41cms (16 ins); bitches: 38 cms (15 ins)."  In short, they did NOT remove a DQ.  They changed the method of measuring size, not the instructions on its relative importance in evaluating an exhibit.  

Whether the change from weight to height came from within the Manchester community or not is unknown to me, but were I guessing it would seem most likely to me that perhaps the Kennel Club may have wanted to make measurements easier to accomplish as weighing dogs is cumbersome and difficult to do accurately.

6) A switch from weight to height was seriously discussed by the AMTC back in the late-80s/early-90s, spear-headed in large part by Myrtle Klensch (Salutaire). I'm sure there is some information available in past AGM minutes about it. 

Myrtle went so far as to conduct several weighing and measuring clinics in an attempt to determine what size range corresponded to the current 22 pound limit. I spoke to Myrtle on the subject at one point after the idea had been defeated and she told me she had discarded the data collected.

OK, I'll leave it there for the moment.  I certainly have lots of my own opinions on the subject, but thought at the very least all of the factual information available should be gathered in one place. With that in mind, if anyone has any historical information to add or any corrections to make to the above please do share.  I am always fascinated to learn more and very willing to be corrected.  Gathering historical information can be challenging.

Regardless of which side of the current issue you fall on, I would hope everyone would want their opinion to be based in an understanding of the breed and breed standard's history--however you choose to read and interpret it (and heavens knows we all read something differently and put emphasis in different areas).

If anyone is interested in further reading, all of the sources I cited, including some old breed standards as well as art through the ages, etc. can be found in the CMTC's Reading Room here: http://www.canadamt.com/historical-reading-room.html

 

Amanda Kelly

×
Stay Informed

When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.

CURIOUS MADCAPS Earl Of Manchester
kopiert, geklaut und für gut empfunden, danke Gabi